Rent repayment orders near IG8 0FB
Based on 20 decisions within 5 km of IG8 0FB, decided between June 2019 and August 2026.
The search widens from 2 km (to 5, 10 km, then the local authority) until at least 10 decisions have a checked amount. See all of Redbridge.
Thinking of applying? Make a rent repayment order pack: the licensing position for the address, the most the tribunal could order from your rent and dates, what tribunals ordered for the same offence, the most comparable orders near you with the tribunal's reasoning, the time limit and form RRO1, as one PDF to print. Nothing you enter is stored unless you ask for a reminder, and then only your email and the date.
What the tribunal ordered within 5 km
21 decisions (15 ended in a rent repayment order). In 15 the amount ordered has been checked.
"Typical" means the median: half the decisions are above it and half below. n is the number of decisions a figure comes from.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 75% 15 of 20 | 71% 5 of 7 | 77% 10 of 13 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £3,588 n=15 | £5,400 n=5 | £2,840 n=10 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £8,908 n=15, typically 2 applicants | £5,400 n=5, typically 2 applicants | £9,134 n=10, typically 2 applicants |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | 55% n=11 | too few n=2 | 55% n=9 |
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 6 | 50% 3 of 6 | too few n=3 | too few n=3 |
| Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | 11 | 91% 10 of 11 | £4,712 n=10 | £7,154 n=10, typically 2 applicants |
| Harassment | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
| Improvement notice not complied with | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
| Other | 2 | too few 0 of 1 | – | – |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
How these figures are counted
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 Woodberry Way, London, E4 7DX Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,000 | £8,642.86 | £1,728.50 | £3,457 | 2 | 40% | 7 Nov 2023 | 2.1 km |
| 16 Normanshire Drive, London E4 9HF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company and individuals | £1,300 | £15,600 | £6,240 | £12,480 | 2 | 80% | 12 Jul 2023 | 2.7 km |
| Flat 36 Avondale Court, Churchfields, London E18 2RD Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company Craftrule Limited |
£1,150 | £4,025 | £4,025 | 1 | 28 Jun 2019 | 2.7 km | ||
| 24 Lyndhurst Road, London, E4 9JU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company and individuals | £1,900 | £22,800 | £11,400 | £11,400 | 1 | 50% | 17 Mar 2023 | 2.8 km |
| 149 High Road, South Woodford, London, E18 2PA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 2 | 18 Nov 2021 | 2.9 km | ||||
| 119A Maybank Road, London E18 1EJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,175 | £12,204.84 | £6,102.42 | £12,204.84 | 2 | 100% | 19 Jul 2021 | 3.1 km |
| Flat 2, 49a Salisbury Hall Road, London, E4 8SA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company and individuals N Smart Solutions Limited |
£1,350 | £16,196.15 | £8,907.88 | £8,907.88 | 1 | 55% | 29 Oct 2025 | 3.3 km |
| 128D George Lane, London E18 1AD Read the reasoning period not stated | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company Ferman Property Ltd |
Out of time or no jurisdiction | 1 | 25 Aug 2026 | 3.3 km | ||||
| 69 Kitchener Road, London, E17 4LJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,200 | £14,400 | £3,120 | £9,360 | 3 | 65% | 22 Dec 2025 | 3.6 km |
| 115 Sturge Avenue, E17 4LF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,400 | £16,850 | £2,527.50 | £5,055 | 2 | 30% | 23 Dec 2024 | 3.8 km |
| 100 & 100A Turner Road, London E17 3JQ Read the reasoning old rules | Other | individual | Other ruling | 1 | 18 Jun 2025 | 4.3 km | ||||
| 92 Millfield Avenue, London, E17 5HL Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Dismissed | 1 | 14 Apr 2025 | 4.5 km | ||||
| First Floor Flat 9a Carr Rd E17 5ER Read the reasoning old rules | Improvement notice not complied with | individual | £1,450 | £837 | £1,674 | 2 | 10 Feb 2023 | 4.5 km | ||
| Aston Grange Care Home 418-512 Forest Road London E17 4NZ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Acer Investments Ltd |
£126,866.44 | £2,406.78 | £64,982.94 | 27 | 61% | 11 Jun 2024 | 4.6 km | |
| Aston Grange Care Home 418-512 Forest Road London E17 4NZ Read the reasoning old rulessame decision as LON/00BH/HMF/2021/0214 | Unlicensed HMO | company Acer Investments Ltd |
27 | 11 Jun 2024 | 4.6 km | |||||
| Aston Grange Care Home , 484-512 Forest Rd E17 4NZ Read the reasoning old rules | Other | company Acer Investments Ltd |
Out of time or no jurisdiction | 3 | 17 Mar 2023 | 4.6 km | ||||
| 81 Church Lane, Walthamstow, London, E17 9RN Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £6,400 | £2,560 | £5,120 | 2 | 80% | 1 Aug 2025 | 4.7 km | |
| (x3) 35 Rodney Place, London, E17 5NN . Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals | £23,919.69 | £3,587.87 | £10,763.62 | 3 | 45% | 22 Apr 2026 | 4.7 km | |
| 55 Brookdale Road, London E17 6QH Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £6,053.22 | £18,159.67 | 3 | 20 May 2022 | 4.9 km | |||
| 24 Eastfield Road, London E17 3BA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £229.17 | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 3 | 20 Mar 2020 | 5.0 km | |||
| 24 Eastfield Road, London E17 3BA Read the reasoning old rulessame decision as LON/00BH/HMF/2019/0070 | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £229.17 | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 3 | 20 Mar 2020 | 5.0 km | |||
| 71A Greenleaf Road, London, E17 6QW Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £900 | £10,800 | £5,400 | £5,400 | 1 | 50% | 4 Feb 2022 | 5.0 km |
| 33 Fulready Road, London E10 6DT Read the reasoning old rules | Harassment | individual | £680 | £971.05 | £1,942.11 | 2 | 7 Jan 2020 | 5.0 km | ||
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
Email me when a new decision is published near IG8 0FB.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.
Bookmark or share: this page's address rebuilds it from what is in the address itself; nothing is stored on the site.