Rent repayment orders in Redbridge
What the tribunal ordered in Redbridge
21 decisions (12 ended in a rent repayment order). In 11 the amount ordered has been checked.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 63% 12 of 19 | 80% 8 of 10 | 44% 4 of 9 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £4,620 n=11 | £4,025 n=7 | too few n=4 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £6,480 n=11, typically 2 applicants | £5,280 n=7, typically 1 applicant | too few n=4 |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | 70% n=5 | too few n=2 | too few n=3 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 5 | too few 2 of 4 | too few n=2 | too few n=2 |
| Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | 13 | 77% 10 of 13 | £5,280 n=9 | £6,921 n=9, typically 2 applicants |
| Harassment | 1 | too few 0 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
| Violence for securing entry | 1 | too few 0 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
| Other | 1 | too few 0 of 0 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 128D George Lane, London E18 1AD Read the reasoning period not stated | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company Ferman Property Ltd |
Out of time or no jurisdiction | 1 | 25 Aug 2026 | ||||
| 99 Endsleigh Gardens, Ilford, IG1 3EG Read the reasoning period not stated | Harassment | individual | £750 | Dismissed | 1 | 30 Jul 2026 | |||
| Flat 1, 570 Cranbrook Road, Ilford, Essex, IG2 6RE Read the reasoning period not stated | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company The Interview Room Limited |
Out of time or no jurisdiction | 1 | 26 Jul 2026 | ||||
| 21 Courtland Avenue, IIford, IG1 3DN Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company and individuals | £26,844 | £7,382.10 | £14,764.20 | 2 | 55% | 20 Jun 2026 | |
| 51 Castleview Gardens, London, IG1 3QF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Dismissed | 4 | 15 Jun 2026 | ||||
| 1 Farely Drive, Ilford, IG3 8LT . Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals Clevarent Ltd |
£6,300 | £4,725 | £4,725 | 1 | 75% | 24 Feb 2025 | |
| 66 Capel Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9DG Read the reasoning old rules | Violence for securing entry | individual | £800 | Dismissed | 1 | 3 Sep 2024 | |||
| Flat 115, Memorial Heights, Monarch Way, Ilford, Essex, IG2 7HS Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,100 | £13,200 | £4,620 | £9,240 | 2 | 70% | 26 Jun 2023 |
| Flat 38 Oakside Court Fencepiece Road, Ilford Essex IG6 2PH Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £16,200 | £3,240 | £6,480 | 2 | 40% | 19 Apr 2023 | |
| 5 Dawlish Drive, Ilford, Essex, IG3 9ED Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £2,382 | £24,414.18 | £24,414.18 | 1 | 28 Sep 2022 | ||
| Flat 2, 66 Aldborough Road South, Ilford, Essex, IG3 8EX Read the reasoning old rules | Other | individual | Other ruling | 2 | 7 Apr 2022 | ||||
| 16 Bolton Road, London E15 6JY Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £680 | £1,013.08 | £2,026.16 | 2 | 5 Apr 2022 | ||
| 149 High Road, South Woodford, London, E18 2PA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 2 | 18 Nov 2021 | ||||
| 72 Aldborough Road South, Ilford, Essex, IG3 8EX Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,250 | £3,125 | £6,250 | 2 | 8 Sep 2021 | ||
| 1079 High Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, Essex, RM6 4AU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company Chadwell Holdings Limited |
£710 | £7,284.75 | £6,920.51 | £6,920.51 | 1 | 95% | 23 Aug 2021 |
| 119A Maybank Road, London E18 1EJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,175 | £12,204.84 | £6,102.42 | £12,204.84 | 2 | 100% | 19 Jul 2021 |
| Flat 2, 94 Belgrave Road, Ilford IG1 3AL Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £1,413 | £1,413 | 1 | 18 Mar 2021 | |||
| 28 Kensington Gardens, Ilford, Essex, IG1 3EL Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £2,200 | £5,280 | £5,280 | 1 | 19 Apr 2020 | ||
| Flat 28, 2-20 Hainault Street, 4th Floor, Spectrum Towers, Ilford IG1 4GZ Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £6,600 | £660 | £660 | 1 | 10% | 14 Feb 2020 | |
| 27A Wanstead Park Road, Ilford IG1 3TG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,150 | Dismissed | 2 | 25 Jul 2019 | |||
| Flat 36 Avondale Court, Churchfields, London E18 2RD Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company Craftrule Limited |
£1,150 | £4,025 | £4,025 | 1 | 28 Jun 2019 | ||
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.