Rent repayment orders near SE20 8FX
Showing decisions within 5 km of SE20 8FX. The search starts at 2 km and widens (to 5 km, 10 km, then the whole local authority) until at least 10 decisions have a checked amount. See all of Bromley.
What the tribunal ordered within 5 km
31 decisions (24 ended in a rent repayment order). In 23 the amount ordered has been checked.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 77% 24 of 31 | 63% 12 of 19 | 100% 12 of 12 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £2,858 n=22 | £3,320 n=11 | £2,853 n=11 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £7,200 n=23, typically 3 applicants | £4,915 n=12, typically 2 applicants | £11,162 n=11, typically 4 applicants |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | 68% n=8 | 85% n=5 | too few n=3 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 26 | 77% 20 of 26 | £2,858 n=18 | £8,558 n=19, typically 3 applicants |
| Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | 2 | too few 2 of 2 | too few n=2 | too few n=2 |
| Illegal eviction | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
| Harassment | 2 | too few 1 of 2 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162 Lambourne House, Apple Yard, London SE20 8FX Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Dismissed | 2 | 6 May 2021 | 0.0 km | ||||
| 85 South Norwood Hill, London SE25 6BY Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £4,924.22 | £24,621.12 | 5 | 15 Oct 2019 | 1.2 km | |||
| 2C Mountbatten Close, London SE19 1AP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Maurice Laurent Limited |
Dismissed | 1 | 6 Jul 2022 | 1.6 km | ||||
| Room 2, 234 Gipsy Road, London SE27 9RB Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £750 | £5,720.75 | £715.10 | £1,430.19 | 2 | 25% | 27 May 2022 | 2.0 km |
| 93B Sydenham Road, London, SE26 5EZ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,800 | £22,992.18 | £4,311 | £17,244 | 4 | 75% | 16 Jul 2026 | 2.1 km |
| Flat 37 Forest Croft, SE23 3UN Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £4,174.09 | £12,522.28 | 3 | 25 Apr 2024 | 3.0 km | |||
| 96 Perry Vale SE23 2LQ & Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,852.79 | £8,558.38 | 3 | 27 Jun 2025 | 3.0 km | |||
| 179 Norbury Crescent, Streatham, London SW16 4JX Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £450 | £5,400 | £5,400 | £5,400 | 1 | 100% | 10 Jul 2019 | 3.0 km |
| 67 Beverstone Road, Thornton Heath, Surrey, CR7 7LX Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £600 | £7,200 | £3,600 | £7,200 | 2 | 100% | 8 Jun 2021 | 3.2 km |
| Flat 6, 228 Bensham Lane, Thornton Heath, Surrey, CR7 7EP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company ABC Business Centres Limited |
£4,430 | £4,430 | 1 | 23 Jan 2019 | 3.2 km | |||
| 49B London Road, SE23 3TY Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £1,205.67 | £3,617.01 | 3 | 7 Jul 2021 | 3.2 km | |||
| 28 Hainthorpe Road, London, SE27 0PH Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,057.96 | £6,173.89 | 3 | 3 Nov 2021 | 3.3 km | |||
| 9 David’s Road London SE23 3EP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,760 | £22,408 | £1,568.56 | £7,842.80 | 5 | 35% | 4 Feb 2026 | 3.3 km |
| 958 Thornton Road, Thornton Heath, Surrey, CR7 7PG Read the reasoning old rulescouncil application | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £6,287.50 | council | 6 Aug 2013 | 3.5 km | ||||
| 1, Leof Crescent, Lewisham, London SE6 3QP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £4,978.30 | £9,956.59 | 2 | 6 Jan 2026 | 3.6 km | |||
| 2 Oakhill Road, London SW16 5RG Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | individual | £320.17 | £3,842 | £2,281.50 | £2,281.50 | 1 | 59% | 14 Oct 2019 | 3.7 km |
| 114 Malham Road, London, SE23 1AN Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,790.55 | £11,162.18 | 4 | 28 Oct 2024 | 3.9 km | |||
| Room 4, 41 Valley Road, London SW16 2XL Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company | £700 | Dismissed | 1 | 18 May 2021 | 3.9 km | |||
| 2D Kinfauns Road, London, SW2 3JL Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,060 | £24,720 | £3,708 | £14,832 | 4 | 60% | 14 Aug 2025 | 4.0 km |
| 48 Hopton Road, London, SW16 2EN Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,050 | £12,300 | 6 | 21 Feb 2023 | 4.0 km | |||
| 150 Forest Hill Road, Forest Hill, London SE23 3QR , 0064 & 0069 Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,100 | £3,320 | £16,600 | 5 | 9 Mar 2020 | 4.3 km | ||
| 63 Darcy Street, London SW16 4TZ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company and individuals | £400 | £1,832.25 | £1,832.25 | 1 | 12 Jul 2021 | 4.3 km | ||
| 316 Devonshire Road, London SE23 3TH and Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £1,890 | £5,670 | 3 | 7 Dec 2023 | 4.4 km | |||
| 4 Woodgate Drive, London, SW16 5YP Read the reasoning old rules | Harassment | individual | £675 | £4,005 | £3,404 | £3,404 | 1 | 85% | 26 Nov 2021 | 4.4 km |
| 153 Downton Avenue, Streatham Hill, SW2 Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,300 | Dismissed | 5 | 14 Sep 2021 | 4.4 km | |||
| 89 Churchmore Road, London SW16 5XA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Dismissed | 1 | 12 Sep 2019 | 4.6 km | ||||
| 44 Aberfoyle Road, London, SW16 5AA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £6,688 | £13,376 | 2 | 16 Dec 2025 | 4.7 km | |||
| 7 Stillness Road, Honor Oak, London SE23 1NG Read the reasoning old rules | Harassment | individual | £1,150 | Dismissed | 1 | 27 Feb 2020 | 4.7 km | |||
| 14 Amesbury Avenue, London SW2 3AA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £800 | £524.02 | £524.02 | 1 | 26 Oct 2023 | 4.7 km | ||
| 72 Abercairn Road London SW16 5AD Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Dismissed | 3 | 10 Aug 2020 | 4.8 km | ||||
| Flat 1, 53 Streatham Hill, London SW2 4TS Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,550 | £2,862.64 | £11,450.54 | 4 | 20 Jul 2023 | 4.9 km | ||
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
Email me when a new decision is published near SE20 8FX.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.