153 Downton Avenue, Streatham Hill, SW2

From the tribunal's reasons on the amount

deliberate attempt to mislead the tribunal. The tribunal’s decision. The tribunal carefully considered the application to adduce further evidence and/or an adjournment. In doing so the tribunal considered the overriding objective and the issues raised by admissions made by the applicants and the application to rely on further fundamental evidence that went to the substance of the application. Although the tribunal frequently exercises a degree of leniency to parties in respect of their compliance with directions, particularly where a party appears unrepresented, the tribunal determined that in this application, these matters should and could have been addressed at a much earlier stage by the applicants as they went to the substance of their application. The tribunal determined in the absence of any, or any compelling reason as to why this evidence could not have been provided earlier, that prejudice was caused to the respondent and to the tribunal’s proper management of its resources. Therefore, the application to adduce further evidence and/or to adjourn was refused. The applicants’ case. The applicants sought to rely on the documents provided in their hearing bundles. … None of the applicants had complied with the tribunal’s direction by making any witness statement on which they could rely as their evidence-in-chief. …

An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.

The original

• This decision on GOV.UK
• PDF

Other rent repayment orders near SW2 3TX · Licensing schemes and register for SW2 3TX