63 Darcy Street, London SW16 4TZ
LON/00AH/HMF/2020/0258 · Croydon · decided 12 Jul 2021 · rent repayment order
old rules| Offence | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Company and individuals |
| Applicants | 1 tenant |
| Rent | £400 per month |
| Period the order relates to | 3 Jan 2020 to 30 Sep 2020 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure (or not yet checked); £1,131.01 then deducted for utilities |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £1,832.25 (1 applicant) |
| Share of the maximum | 25%, as the tribunal stated it |
| Tribunal fees to be reimbursed | £300 |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the maximum is left out of the statistics until it has been checked.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
paid. There is no provision to enable the First - tier Tribunal to make an order requiring the managing/letting agents to repay any amount under a RRO unless of course the managing/letting agent is also a landlord of the property in question. The relevant period. At the hearing on the basis of the submission made by the Respondent, the Applicant accepted that the relevant period for the RRO is from 3rd January 2020 until 30 September 2020. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds the relevant period of the RRO to be from 3rd January 2020 until 30 September 2020. The maximum amount. The Applicant also accepted the submission of the 2nd Respondent that the total maximum amount payable in respect of the RRO should be £ 3577.00. However, the Tribunal calculates the maximum RRO figure for the period of 3 January to 30 September to be £3,574.19 as follows: a. February to September Rent at £400 PCM x 8 = £3,200 b. … Rent of £400PCM divided by 31 to calculate the daily rent and multiplied by 29 = £374.19 . c. Total maximum RRO £3,200 +£374.19= £3,574.19. The deductions. At the hearing ,the Applicant agreed and accepted all the deductions proposed by the Respondents except the deduction in relation to the cleaning charge. The Applicant stated that he had been promised a cleaning service but this was not provided. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near SW16 4TZ · Licensing schemes and register for SW16 4TZ
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.