Rent Rise Check

← Back

114 Malham Road, London, SE23 1AN

LON/00AZ/HMF/2024/0084 · Lewisham · decided 28 Oct 2024 · rent repayment order

old rules
OffenceUnlicensed HMO
LandlordIndividual
Applicants4 tenants
Rentnot stated as one figure
Period the order relates to6 Dec 2020 to 20 Jun 2023
Maximum the tribunal could awardnot stated as one figure (or not yet checked); £1,897.40 then deducted for utilities
Amount the tribunal ordered£2,790.55 per applicant on average; £11,162.18 in total for 4 applicants
Share of the maximum65%, as the tribunal stated it
Tribunal fees to be reimbursed£330
RulesOld rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent.

Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the maximum is left out of the statistics until it has been checked.

From the tribunal's reasons on the amount

8 of the Respondent’s bundle). … The Tribunal also did not accept the Respondent’s argument that the rent could be reduced because of any damage the Respondent alleged may have been caused. … When determining the amount of a RRO, the Tribunal has a discretion whether or not to make a deduction for utility payments. … It was accepted by both parties that the rent included utilities. The Respondent included within her bundle evidence of utility payments she had made and at page 2 of her bundle set out that gas and electricity bills averaged £219 per month, internet £27 per month, and water £64 per month which gave a total of £310 per month. The Respondent then divided this between 6 people and concluded that £52 per month, which was £624 per year, for each person should be deducted for utility bills. … This could be summarised as £53.10 for broadband (made up of 12 months of broadband at £26.55 per month divided between 6 tenants), and, for gas/electricity, the Applicants had taken the average gas and electricity payment from the bills provided and had calculated a yearly amount of £421.25 per tenant. … The Tribunal did not accept the position that utilities should not be deducted and instead found that this amount should be deducted given the Respondent had made payments for utilities from the rent the Applicants had paid. …

An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.

The original

Other rent repayment orders near SE23 1AN · Licensing schemes and register for SE23 1AN

Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.

The rules are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK.