Rent repayment orders near SW8 1EP
Showing decisions within 2 km of SW8 1EP. The search starts at 2 km and widens (to 5 km, 10 km, then the whole local authority) until at least 10 decisions have a checked amount. See all of Lambeth.
What the tribunal ordered within 2 km
29 decisions (23 ended in a rent repayment order). In 23 the amount ordered has been checked.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 79% 23 of 29 | 80% 8 of 10 | 79% 15 of 19 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £3,999 n=23 | £4,332 n=8 | £3,370 n=15 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £7,998 n=23, typically 2 applicants | £6,134 n=8, typically 2 applicants | £8,749 n=15, typically 3 applicants |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | 66% n=12 | too few n=3 | 60% n=9 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 23 | 83% 19 of 23 | £3,606 n=19 | £8,749 n=19, typically 3 applicants |
| Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
| Illegal eviction | 4 | too few 3 of 4 | too few n=3 | too few n=3 |
| Harassment | 1 | too few 0 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat 24, Purbeck House, Bolney Street, London, SW8 1EP Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | company Simple Properties London Ltd |
£4,620 | £4,620 | 1 | 25 Feb 2021 | 0.0 km | |||
| Flat 9, Rundell Tower, Portland Grove, London SW8 1JB Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | individual | £600 | £2,677 | £2,677 | £2,677 | 1 | 100% | 7 Jun 2022 | 0.3 km |
| Flat 2, 169 Clapham Road, London, SW9 0PU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company | £2,123.33 | £25,479.96 | £5,096.67 | £15,290 | 3 | 60% | 16 Oct 2024 | 0.4 km |
| 42, Cranmer Road, London SW9 6EF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 5 | 28 Feb 2022 | 0.8 km | ||||
| 42 Cranmer Road London SW9 6EF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £650 | £3,606.04 | £3,606.04 | 1 | 21 Sep 2021 | 0.8 km | ||
| 68 Stockwell Park Road, St John’s Park, London SW9 0DA : LON/00/0 Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £1,600 | Dismissed | 2 | 30 Aug 2024 | 0.9 km | |||
| 17 Melbourne Mews, London, SW9 6PY Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,375 | £6,480 | £32,400 | 5 | 11 Mar 2022 | 0.9 km | ||
| Upper Floor Flat, 1 Burnely Road, London SW9 OSH Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £19,445.01 | £3,240.84 | £9,722.51 | 3 | 50% | 16 Feb 2026 | 0.9 km | |
| 7 Burnley Road, London SW9 0SH Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,840.75 | £5,681.50 | 2 | 6 Mar 2022 | 0.9 km | |||
| 42 Sherwin House, SE11 5SB Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £9,900 | £6,712.50 | £6,712.50 | 1 | 68% | 17 Apr 2026 | 0.9 km | |
| 96 Camberwell New Road, London SE5 0RS Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,000 | £7,650 | £30,600 | 4 | 19 Jan 2026 | 1.0 km | ||
| 127 Vassall Road, London SW9 6NJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company | £34,504.53 | £5,607.50 | £22,430 | 4 | 65% | 22 Jan 2025 | 1.0 km | |
| 26 Aveline Street, London SE11 5DQ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals Pineflat Limited |
£2,400 | £26,511.78 | £1,749.78 | £8,748.89 | 5 | 33% | 3 Mar 2025 | 1.1 km |
| 13 Deeley Road, London, SW8 4XG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,016.98 | £1,714.43 | £1,714.43 | 1 | 85% | 19 Feb 2025 | 1.1 km | |
| 6 Kimberley Road, London, SW9 9DG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £823.33 | £9,880 | £6,587 | £6,587 | 1 | 67% | 13 Jan 2022 | 1.3 km |
| 23 Coverley Point, Tyers Street, London SE11 5NR Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | company and individuals Extra Link Limited |
£880 | £10,560 | £10,560 | £10,560 | 1 | 100% | 19 Jan 2025 | 1.3 km |
| 25B Calais Street, Lonodn SE5 9LP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 1 | 15 Aug 2025 | 1.3 km | ||||
| 38 Slade Walk, London SE17 3HW Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company and individuals | £800 | £3,999.20 | £7,998.40 | 2 | 21 Feb 2025 | 1.5 km | ||
| Flat 2, 282 Camberwell New Road, London SE5 0RP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals Visionary Properties Ltd |
Dismissed | 5 | 19 Dec 2019 | 1.5 km | ||||
| Flat 2, 4 St Johns Crescent, London, SW9 7AG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Lexadon Limited |
£2,808 | £33,696 | £3,369.60 | £10,108.80 | 3 | 30% | 22 Apr 2024 | 1.5 km |
| Top Floor Flat, 82 Hubert Grove, London, SW9 9PD Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Mazal Trading Ltd |
£213.50 | £427 | 2 | 23 Feb 2026 | 1.6 km | |||
| Flat 27 Stourhead House 79 Tachbrook Street Lindon SW1V 2QE Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,600 | £13,000.05 | £1,300 | £3,900 | 3 | 30% | 14 Aug 2023 | 1.7 km |
| 3 Camberwell Station Road, London, SE5 9JJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £12,731.29 | £4,243.76 | £12,731.29 | 3 | 100% | 12 Mar 2012 | 1.7 km | |
| 31 Forsyth House, Tachbrook Street, SW1V 2LE Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £900 | £1,508.40 | £3,016.80 | 2 | 13 Mar 2025 | 1.7 km | ||
| Flat B, 28 Edgely Road, London, SW4 6ER Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £650 | £1,941 | £1,941 | 1 | 30 Sep 2022 | 1.8 km | ||
| 68 Littlebury Road, London SW4 6DN Read the reasoning old rules | Harassment | individual | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 2 | 7 Jul 2025 | 1.8 km | ||||
| Flat 3, 139A Coldharbour Lane, London SE5 9NU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £6,240 | £18,720 | 3 | 28 Mar 2025 | 1.9 km | |||
| First Floor Flat, 76 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | company Westerham Limited |
£1,256.70 | Dismissed | 1 | 17 Oct 2023 | 2.0 km | |||
| 17 Rozel Road, London SW4 0EY Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company | £4,420.95 | £26,525.68 | 6 | 24 May 2021 | 2.0 km | |||
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
Email me when a new decision is published near SW8 1EP.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.