Rent repayment orders near SW10 0UU
Showing decisions within 2 km of SW10 0UU. The search starts at 2 km and widens (to 5 km, 10 km, then the whole local authority) until at least 10 decisions have a checked amount. See all of Hammersmith and Fulham.
What the tribunal ordered within 2 km
18 decisions (13 ended in a rent repayment order). In 12 the amount ordered has been checked.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 76% 13 of 17 | 89% 8 of 9 | 62% 5 of 8 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £5,647 n=12 | £6,951 n=8 | too few n=4 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £9,600 n=12, typically 2 applicants | £18,228 n=8, typically 2 applicants | too few n=4 |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | 93% n=6 | too few n=4 | too few n=2 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 13 | 100% 12 of 12 | £5,253 n=11 | £9,600 n=11, typically 1 applicant |
| Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | 2 | too few 1 of 2 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
| Illegal eviction | 1 | too few 0 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
| Other | 2 | too few 0 of 2 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat 12 Admiral Court, London SW10 0UU Read the reasoning old rules | Other | company Golden Homes Property Group Ltd |
Dismissed | 2 | 17 Jun 2024 | 0.0 km | ||||
| 3 Cremorne Road, Chelsea SW10 0NA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £950 | £1,150 | £2,300 | 2 | 12 Oct 2018 | 0.4 km | ||
| Unit 6_2A Byam Street SW6 2RD Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £5,921 | £29,605 | 5 | 20 Feb 2023 | 0.8 km | |||
| 46A Broughton Road, London SW6 2LA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £6,041.35 | £36,248.08 | 6 | 29 Jan 2021 | 0.8 km | |||
| 46a Broughton Road, London SW6 2LA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £28,080 | £6,552 | £19,656 | 3 | 70% | 9 Dec 2019 | 0.8 km | |
| 50 Britannia Road, London, SW6 2JP Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | individual | Dismissed | 2 | 2 Sep 2024 | 0.9 km | ||||
| 78 Harwood Road Fulham SW6 4QH Read the reasoning old rules | Other | individual | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 2 | 5 May 2022 | 0.9 km | ||||
| 28 Afghan Road, London SW11 2QD Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £33,700 | £4,855.17 | £29,131 | 6 | 86% | 20 Oct 2020 | 1.1 km | |
| 173A New Kings Rd, London SW6 4SW Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | Dismissed | 1 | 27 Apr 2024 | 1.2 km | ||||
| (x2) Flat 402, Sulivan Court, Broomhouse Lane, London, SW6 3DL . Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | company | £6,740.07 | £13,480.15 | 2 | 28 Feb 2025 | 1.5 km | |||
| 765a Fulham Road, London, SW6 5HA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £5,252.80 | £5,252.80 | 1 | 14 Jun 2024 | 1.6 km | |||
| Flat 2, 46 Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TN Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company | £3,030 | £1,666.50 | £1,666.50 | 1 | 55% | 6 Feb 2024 | 1.7 km | |
| Flat 13, Block D Peabody Estate, SW6 1UN Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £960 | £3,074.85 | £3,074.85 | 1 | 8 Jun 2026 | 1.8 km | ||
| 10B Comyn Road, London, SW11 1PZ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,739.15 | £3,739.15 | £3,739.15 | 1 | 100% | 27 Jan 2023 | 1.8 km | |
| 44 Aliwal Road, Battersea London SW11 1RD Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,800 | £7,350.33 | £22,051 | 3 | 20 Dec 2021 | 1.9 km | ||
| 6 Bellamy Close, London, W14 9UT Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £866.67 | £9,600 | £9,600 | £9,600 | 1 | 100% | 18 Mar 2021 | 2.0 km |
| 6 Bellamy Close, London W14 9UT Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £866.67 | £9,600 | £9,600 | £9,600 | 1 | 100% | 18 Mar 2021 | 2.0 km |
| Basement Flat, 184 North End Road, London W14 9NX Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,500 | £8,400 | £16,800 | 2 | 14 Feb 2022 | 2.0 km | ||
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
Email me when a new decision is published near SW10 0UU.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.