Flat 2, 66 Aldborough Road South, Ilford, Essex, IG3 8EX
LON/00BC/HMF/2020/0047 · Redbridge · decided 7 Apr 2022 · rent repayment order
old rulesOther ruling: the tribunal did not make a rent repayment order in this decision. See the original for its reasons.
| Offence | Other |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Individual |
| Applicants | 2 tenants |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
unreasonable conduct, that the tribunal did not find it within its jurisdiction to make a RRO did not mean that the applicants had been unreasonable in pursuing their claim. … The applicants submitted that the threshold for unreasonable conduct is a high one, reserved for the clearest of cases and has not been met here. Reasons for the tribunal’s decision. It is clear that there was confusion as to whether the Property needed a selective licence until L B Redbridge produced its witness statement in July 2021. There was also disagreement between the parties as to whether L B Redbridge could backdate the date upon which the respondent applied for the relevant licence for the Property. The limitation issue raised by the respondent in May 2021 related to the effect of L B Redbridge purportedly backdating the date of the application for the licence. It did not relate to the ability to amend the offence alleged in the application more than twelve months after the offence had been committed, which was an issue raised at the hearing in November 2021 by the tribunal. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 8 Dec 2021.
Other rent repayment orders near IG3 8EX · Licensing schemes and register for IG3 8EX
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.