Rent repayment orders in Ealing
What the tribunal ordered in Ealing
19 decisions (12 ended in a rent repayment order). In 11 the amount ordered has been checked.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 67% 12 of 18 | 60% 3 of 5 | 69% 9 of 13 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £3,360 n=11 | too few n=3 | £3,982 n=8 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £5,831 n=11, typically 2 applicants | too few n=3 | £5,525 n=8, typically 2 applicants |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | too few n=4 | – | too few n=4 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 12 | 75% 9 of 12 | £3,737 n=8 | £7,474 n=8, typically 2 applicants |
| Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | 5 | 40% 2 of 5 | too few n=2 | too few n=2 |
| Harassment | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat 5, 27 Summit Road, Northolt UB5 5HJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Uniwell Investments Limited |
Dismissed | 1 | 19 Aug 2026 | ||||
| 1C Fairlawn Avenue, Ealing W4 5EF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,000 | £23,300 | £5,825 | £17,475 | 3 | 75% | 10 Aug 2026 |
| Flat 6A, 36 High Street, Acton, London W3 6LG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company | Dismissed | 1 | 3 Jul 2026 | ||||
| 15 Shakespeare Road, London W3 6SG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Roomerang Holdings Ltd |
£7,743.97 | £23,231.90 | 3 | 18 Mar 2026 | |||
| 6 Mersey Walk, Northolt, UB5 6TH Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,450 | £8,700 | £5,220 | £5,220 | 1 | 60% | 9 Feb 2026 |
| 9 Poppy Close, London UB5 5TP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £1,600 | £4,691.95 | £3,284.37 | £3,284.37 | 1 | 70% | 29 Jan 2026 |
| Flat 2, Hoover Building, Western Avenue, Greenford, UB6 8AT Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company Gastony International Limited |
Dismissed | 1 | 16 Jan 2026 | ||||
| 10 Greystoke House, 150 Brunswick Road, London, W5 1AW Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £2,020 | Dismissed | 2 | 24 Oct 2025 | |||
| 25a Avenue Gardens, London W3 8HB Read the reasoning | Not stated | not stated | Figures not available, see the original decision | 24 Jul 2025 | |||||
| 5 Niagara Avenue, London, W5 4UD Read the reasoning old rules | Harassment | individual | £352 | £3,250 | £3,250 | 1 | 12 May 2025 | ||
| Flat C, 17 Richmond Road, Ealing, London W5 5NS Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £14,400 | £4,680 | £9,360 | 2 | 65% | 7 May 2025 | |
| 8 St Dunstans Gardens, London W3 6QG Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,033 | £1,648.75 | £6,595 | 4 | 6 May 2025 | ||
| 2c Hamilton Road, London W5 2EQ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Peel Ealing Investments Ltd |
£2,280 | £1,943.59 | £5,830.77 | 3 | 19 Oct 2023 | ||
| 15 Rose Garden W5 4JU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Dale Key Limited |
£640 | £1,668 | £3,336 | 2 | 23 Feb 2023 | ||
| 15 Rose Gardens, London, W5 4JU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £640 | Dismissed | 2 | 6 Jun 2022 | |||
| Flat B, 23 Shirley Gardens, London W7 3PT Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Struck out | 1 | 8 Apr 2022 | ||||
| 4B The Vale, London W3 7SB & 0155 Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Roomerang Limited |
£700 | £4,113.87 | £8,227.74 | 2 | 22 Nov 2021 | ||
| 34 Sarsfield Road, Perivale, Greenford, Middlesex UB6 7AE Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £650 | £3,360 | £6,720 | 2 | 15 May 2019 | ||
| 70 Highview Road, West Ealing, W13 0HW Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Big Egg Properties Limited |
£211.76 | £1,694.07 | 8 | 31 May 2018 | |||
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.