Rent repayment orders in Croydon
What the tribunal ordered in Croydon
14 decisions (11 ended in a rent repayment order). In 11 the amount ordered has been checked.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 79% 11 of 14 | 83% 10 of 12 | too few 1 of 2 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £2,715 n=10 | £3,148 n=9 | too few n=1 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £3,148 n=11, typically 1 applicant | £3,789 n=10, typically 1 applicant | too few n=1 |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | 54% n=6 | 59% n=5 | too few n=1 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 6 | 83% 5 of 6 | too few n=4 | £6,288 n=5, typically 2 applicants |
| Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | 6 | 83% 5 of 6 | £1,832 n=5 | £2,738 n=5, typically 1 applicant |
| Illegal eviction | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
| Harassment | 1 | too few 0 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 380 Brighton Road, South Croydon, CR2 6AL Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £800 | £1,886 | £906 | £906 | 1 | 48% | 17 Aug 2026 |
| 88 Montpelier Road, London CR8 2QB Read the reasoning old rules | Harassment | company New Unicorn Enterprises Ltd |
£2,700 | Dismissed | 1 | 27 Nov 2025 | |||
| Flat 6, 51 Fox Hill, London SE19 2NE Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company | Withdrawn | 2 | 7 Apr 2022 | ||||
| 63 Darcy Street, London SW16 4TZ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company and individuals | £400 | £1,832.25 | £1,832.25 | 1 | 12 Jul 2021 | ||
| 67 Beverstone Road, Thornton Heath, Surrey, CR7 7LX Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £600 | £7,200 | £3,600 | £7,200 | 2 | 100% | 8 Jun 2021 |
| Room C, 9A The Bridle Road, Purley, CR8 3JB Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £550 | £3,147.77 | £3,147.77 | 1 | 7 Apr 2021 | ||
| 49 Russell Hill Road, Croydon, CR8 2XB Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 10 | 22 Feb 2021 | ||||
| 49 West Street, Croydon, Surrey CR0 1DJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company and individuals | £9,125.48 | £1,368.82 | £2,737.64 | 2 | 30% | 4 Dec 2020 | |
| 58a Chapel View South Croydon CR2 7LF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | £900 | £8,395.90 | £1,250 | £2,500 | 2 | 30% | 8 Jan 2020 |
| 85 South Norwood Hill, London SE25 6BY Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £4,924.22 | £24,621.12 | 5 | 15 Oct 2019 | |||
| 2 Oakhill Road, London SW16 5RG Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | individual | £320.17 | £3,842 | £2,281.50 | £2,281.50 | 1 | 59% | 14 Oct 2019 |
| 179 Norbury Crescent, Streatham, London SW16 4JX Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £450 | £5,400 | £5,400 | £5,400 | 1 | 100% | 10 Jul 2019 |
| Flat 6, 228 Bensham Lane, Thornton Heath, Surrey, CR7 7EP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | company ABC Business Centres Limited |
£4,430 | £4,430 | 1 | 23 Jan 2019 | |||
| 958 Thornton Road, Thornton Heath, Surrey, CR7 7PG Read the reasoning old rulescouncil application | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £6,287.50 | council | 6 Aug 2013 | ||||
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.