Rent repayment orders near TW20 9EB
Showing decisions within 10 km of TW20 9EB. The search starts at 2 km and widens (to 5 km, 10 km, then the whole local authority) until at least 10 decisions have a checked amount. There are fewer than that within 10 km and in the local authority. See all of Runnymede.
What the tribunal ordered within 10 km
10 decisions (5 ended in a rent repayment order). In 3 the amount ordered has been checked.
Only 3 decisions with a checked amount. That is too few to show a pattern.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 50% 5 of 10 | too few 0 of 3 | 71% 5 of 7 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | too few n=3 | – | too few n=3 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | too few n=3 | – | too few n=3 |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | too few n=3 | – | too few n=3 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 5 | 60% 3 of 5 | too few n=2 | too few n=2 |
| Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
| Illegal eviction | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
| Harassment | 2 | too few 0 of 2 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
| Other | 1 | too few 0 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Langham Place, Egham, Surrey, TW20 9EB Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 5 | 22 Dec 2021 | 0.0 km | ||||
| 77 Park Avenue, Egham, Surrey TW20 8HL Read the reasoning old rules | Harassment | individual | Dismissed | 1 | 28 May 2021 | 1.8 km | ||||
| 77 Park Avenue, Egham, Surrey, TW20 8HL Read the reasoning old rules | Harassment | individual | £630 | Dismissed | 2 | 5 Jul 2021 | 1.8 km | |||
| 145A Upton Road, Slough, SL1 2AE Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £507.50 | Dismissed | 1 | 17 Jul 2025 | 8.2 km | |||
| 16 Kendal Close, Feltham, TW14 9QG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals | £1,250 | £15,000 | £3,750 | £11,250 | 3 | 75% | 13 May 2025 | 9.1 km |
| 48 Hillside, Slough SL1 2RW Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) | individual | 3 | 12 Dec 2022 | 9.1 km | |||||
| 8A Spring Corner, Feltham, TW13 4PA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £400 | £328.75 | £164.37 | £164.37 | 1 | 50% | 26 Jan 2026 | 9.3 km |
| 35 Rochester Avenue, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4EA Read the reasoning old rules | Other | individual | Dismissed | 1 | 26 Jan 2024 | 9.5 km | ||||
| 12 Bank Spur, Cippenham, Slough, SL19JF Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | individual | £1,400 | £10,600 | £7,420 | £7,420 | 1 | 70% | 9 Aug 2023 | 9.6 km |
| 52 Parkfield Road, Hounslow, TW13 7LG Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £9,591.24 | £757.84 | £4,547.07 | 6 | 47% | 28 Oct 2025 | 9.6 km | |
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
Email me when a new decision is published near TW20 9EB.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.