Rent repayment orders in Hounslow
What the tribunal ordered in Hounslow
18 decisions (15 ended in a rent repayment order). In 11 the amount ordered has been checked.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 83% 15 of 18 | too few 3 of 4 | 86% 12 of 14 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £2,858 n=11 | too few n=3 | £2,696 n=8 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £4,037 n=11, typically 1 applicant | too few n=3 | £2,696 n=8, typically 1 applicant |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | 62% n=6 | too few n=1 | 75% n=5 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 16 | 94% 15 of 16 | £2,858 n=11 | £4,037 n=11, typically 1 applicant |
| Illegal eviction | 1 | too few 0 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
| Other | 1 | too few 0 of 1 | too few n=0 | too few n=0 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Bulstrode Avenue, Hounslow TW3 3AA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £750 | £3,000 | £2,700 | £2,700 | 1 | 90% | 14 Jul 2026 |
| Flat 301, Hive House, Capital Interchange Way, Brentford, TW8 0SL Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | individual | Dismissed | 1 | 26 Jan 2026 | ||||
| 8A Spring Corner, Feltham, TW13 4PA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £400 | £328.75 | £164.37 | £164.37 | 1 | 50% | 26 Jan 2026 |
| 44 Dorset Waye, Hounslow, TW5 0ND Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £850 | £2,996.70 | £5,993.40 | 2 | 17 Nov 2025 | ||
| 35 Jersey Road, Hounslow, TW3 4BQ Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £16,800 | £8,400 | £16,800 | 2 | 100% | 3 Nov 2025 | |
| 52 Parkfield Road, Hounslow, TW13 7LG Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £9,591.24 | £757.84 | £4,547.07 | 6 | 47% | 28 Oct 2025 | |
| (x4) 31 Cambridge Road North, London, W4 4AA . Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,126.60 | £12,506.40 | 4 | 4 Jul 2025 | |||
| 16 Kendal Close, Feltham, TW14 9QG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals | £1,250 | £15,000 | £3,750 | £11,250 | 3 | 75% | 13 May 2025 |
| 167B Gunnersbury Lane, London W3 8LJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £680 | £4,036.66 | £4,036.66 | 1 | 18 Feb 2025 | ||
| (x3) 22 Chester Road, Hounslow, TW4 6HX Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,082.50 | £9,247.50 | 3 | 30 Sep 2024 | |||
| 35 Rochester Avenue, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4EA Read the reasoning old rules | Other | individual | Dismissed | 1 | 26 Jan 2024 | ||||
| 47, Cardington Square, Hounslow, Middlesex TW4 6AJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £1,049.25 | £1,049.25 | 1 | 23 Jan 2024 | |||
| 67 Harewood Road, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5HN Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £7,485.81 | £2,691.07 | £2,691.07 | 1 | 36% | 17 Aug 2023 | |
| 51 Eversley Crescent, Isleworth, Middlesex, TW7 4LD Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,750 | £2,062.50 | £2,062.50 | 1 | 75% | 20 Mar 2023 | |
| 1 Kingsleigh Close, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 0PA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals Alpha Estates.net Limited |
£2,244 | £24,684 | £3,085.50 | £12,342 | 4 | 50% | 31 Mar 2022 |
| Stamford Brook Centre, Stamford Brook Avenue, London W6 0YD , & 0008 Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company | £3,951.64 | £43,468 | 11 | 15 Dec 2021 | |||
| 26 Campion Road, TW7 5HS Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Beachcourt Properties Ltd |
Out of time or no jurisdiction | 1 | 2 Jul 2021 | ||||
| 8 Hibernia Road, Hounslow, TW3 3RY Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £850 | £2,857.50 | £5,715 | 2 | 15 Dec 2020 | ||
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.