Leasehold decisions near SS7 2PB
Based on 13 decisions within 5 km of SS7 2PB.
The search widens from 2 km (to 5, then 10 km) until at least 10 decisions are found.
What the tribunal decided here
13 decisions: dispensation from consultation 5, right to manage 3, service charges 3, LIS 1, variation of lease 1. 4 are service charge cases, 3 with a readable outcome.
Only 3 decisions with a readable outcome. That is too few to show a pattern.
Dispensation applications (landlord-driven, never in the share above): 5, granted 4, refused 0.
Items most often disallowed or reduced here: repairs and maintenance (1), insurance (1).
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (2 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82-84 High Street, Hadleigh, Benfleet, SS7 2PB | right to manage | Other decision | Assethold Limited | 2 Dec 2024 | 0.0 km | |||
| 80 High Street, Hadleigh, Benfleet, Essex SS7 2PB | right to manage | Other decision | Assethold Ltd | 29 Mar 2024 | 0.0 km | |||
| Heath Lodge, 122 London Road, Hadleigh, Benfleet, Essex, SS7 2PG | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Vitis Freeholds Ltd | other | 5 Jun 2026 | 0.3 km | ||
| 35 and 35a Marine Parade, Leigh on Sea, Essex, SS9 2NB | dispensation from consultation | Consultation failure found | repairs and maintenance | 16 May 2024 | 2.7 km | |||
| 1307-1321 London Road, Leigh on Sea, SS9 2AD | right to manage | Other decision | Ingleton Luxury Homes City Apartments Ltd | 21 Jan 2026 | 3.1 km | |||
| First Floor Flat 92A Bellhouse Lane Leigh on Sea Essex SS9 4PQ | service charges | Reduced s.20C order made |
Porterman Investments Limited | administration charges, insurance | 18 May 2020 | 3.1 km | ||
| 56 Elmleigh Drive, Southend SS9 3DN | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | repairs and maintenance | 22 Aug 2019 | 3.4 km | |||
| Havengore House, Elm Road Leigh on Sea, Essex SS9 1SS | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | (Leigh on Sea) Limited | repairs and maintenance | 19 Aug 2024 | 3.4 km | ||
| Flat 6 Central Apartments, 151B High Street, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 7QA figures not yet checked | LIS | Payable as demanded s.20C refused |
Taylor Surveyors Ltd | Overpier Ltd | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance | 9 Jan 2021 | 3.5 km | |
| 110 Oakleigh Park Drive, Leigh on Sea, Essex, SS9 1RU | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Warwick Estates Property Management Limited | repairs and maintenance | 9 Jun 2025 | 3.7 km | ||
| 103 and 103A Oakleigh Park Drive, Leigh-on-Sea, Essex SS9 1RR | service charges | Payable as demanded s.20C refused |
Forcelux Limited | insurance | 24 Feb 2023 | 3.7 km | ||
| 4, 15 and 17 Riverfront, Canvey Island, Essex, SS8 7QP | service charges | Dismissed or struck out s.20C refused |
LMS Sheridans Ltd | Tulsesence Limited | administration charges | 7 Jul 2025 | 4.1 km | |
| 28 Clatterfield Gardens Westcliff on Sea, Essex SS0 0AX figures not yet checked | variation of lease | Dismissed or struck out s.20C refused |
insurance, repairs and maintenance | 3 Dec 2024 | 4.7 km |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.