Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SS9 1RR

103 and 103A Oakleigh Park Drive, Leigh-on-Sea, Essex SS9 1RR

CAM/00KF/LSC/2022/0055 · service charges · Southend-on-Sea · decided 24 Feb 2023

No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordForcelux Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 2 flats
Service charge years in dispute2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022
Items in disputeinsurance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£8,690.50
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The properties are two self-contained flats (103 on the ground floor and 103A on the first floor)
freeholder
The respondent landlord demanding the relevant service charges is Forcelux Limited.
years
The application relates to the accounting years 2016-2022 inclusive.
outcome
The tribunal determines that the following sums are payable and reasonable as a service charge in relation to the relevant cost of buildings insurance
total demanded
The total value of the dispute is stated to be £8,690.50.
s20c
the tribunal did not go on to consider any order pursuant to s20C of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.