4, 15 and 17 Riverfront, Canvey Island, Essex, SS8 7QP
CAM/22UE/LSC/2023/0075 · service charges · Castle Point · decided 7 Jul 2025
The Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction over the leaseholder's issues, struck the application out, and made no section 20C order.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tulsesence Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | LMS Sheridans Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Tulsesence Limited
- agent
[name] Talab, on behalf of LMS Sheridans Ltd, the managing agent appointed by the Respondent
- years
for the service charge years 2021 to 2024.
- outcome
and struck the application out under rule 9(2)(a) of the
- s20c
The Tribunal did not find that it was just and equitable in the circumstances for an order to be made under section 20C
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.