Flat 6 Central Apartments, 151B High Street, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 7QA
CAM/22UL/LIS/2020/0009 · LIS · Rochford · decided 9 Jan 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the service charges claimed for 2014 to 2020 reasonable and payable, apart from a £31.68 credit conceded for four wrongly recharged roof invoices, and refused the tenant's request to bar the landlord's costs being added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Overpier Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Taylor Surveyors Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Overpier Ltd
- agent
He is a Director of [name] Surveyors Ltd who were instructed as agents by the Landlords, Overpier Limited in July 2014.
- years
the period between 2014- 2020 are payable under the lease and reasonable
- outcome
The service charges claimed by the Respondents for the period 2014 to date are reasonable.
- items reduced
The Respondents conceded that four invoices should not have been recharged to the Applicant and a credit of £31.68 will be given.
- s20c
The Tribunal can find no basis for exercising its discretion under s.20C.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.