1307-1321 London Road, Leigh on Sea, SS9 2AD
CAM/00KF/LRM/2025/0011 · right to manage · Southend-on-Sea · decided 21 Jan 2026
The tribunal found that the second respondent's document was not a valid counter-notice, so the right to manage was acquired automatically on 19 October 2025, the case was struck out, and the respondent was ordered to reimburse the £114 application fee.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ingleton Luxury Homes City Apartments Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse application fee £114 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
the First Respondent, Ingleton Luxury Homes [name] Ltd (Company Registration No.
- outcome
strikes out the remainder of the Applicant’s case for a determination under section 84(3) of the Act
- costs
orders the Second Respondent, Assethold Limited, to pay £114 to the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.