Rent repayment orders near SE9 4TG
Showing decisions within 5 km of SE9 4TG. The search starts at 2 km and widens (to 5 km, 10 km, then the whole local authority) until at least 10 decisions have a checked amount. See all of Greenwich.
What the tribunal ordered within 5 km
18 decisions (15 ended in a rent repayment order). In 14 the amount ordered has been checked.
| All | Before 5 Sep 2022 | Since 5 Sep 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ended in a rent repayment order | 83% 15 of 18 | 100% 10 of 10 | 62% 5 of 8 |
| Typical amount ordered, per applicant | £2,532 n=14 | £4,143 n=9 | £2,120 n=5 |
| Typical amount ordered, per decision | £4,200 n=14, typically 2 applicants | £4,160 n=9, typically 2 applicants | £4,240 n=5, typically 2 applicants |
| Typical share of the maximum the tribunal could award | 74% n=8 | 74% n=6 | too few n=2 |
No decision here yet concerns an offence on or after 1 May 2026, when the maximum rose to 24 months' rent. Every figure is under the old rules, where the maximum was 12 months' rent.
"Per applicant" divides what the tribunal ordered in a decision by the number of applicants in it; "per decision" is the total ordered across all of them, as the decision states it.
"Typical" is the median. n is the number of decisions each figure comes from. Figures from fewer than 5 decisions are shown as "too few".
The Upper Tribunal set out how the amount is fixed in Acheampong v Roman on 5 September 2022.
By offence
| Offence | Decisions | Ended in an order | Typical amount ordered, per applicant | Typical amount ordered, per decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed HMO | 16 | 81% 13 of 16 | £1,835 n=12 | £4,191 n=12, typically 2 applicants |
| Illegal eviction | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
| Other | 1 | too few 1 of 1 | too few n=1 | too few n=1 |
The tribunal can only make an order if it is sure, beyond reasonable doubt, that the landlord committed the offence. That is why not every application ends in an order. Old rules: offence before 1 May 2026, maximum 12 months' rent. New rules: offence on or after 1 May 2026, maximum 24 months' rent.
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.
Left out of the figures, but listed below: decisions whose outcome or amount we haven't been able to check. Dismissed, withdrawn, struck-out and out-of-time applications count towards "ended in an order" but never supply an amount.
Download these as a PDF The figures and the list below, with a GOV.UK link for every decision: something you can attach to an RRO1 application. Individual landlords are not named in it.
Click an address, or "Read the reasoning", to see why the tribunal decided what it did: the figures, an extract from its reasons on the amount and a link to the full decision on GOV.UK.
| Address | Offence | Landlord | Rent pcm | Maximum | Per applicant | Ordered, total | Applicants | Share | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rooms 2 and 4, 209 Court Road, Mottingham, London SE9 4TG Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Blok Management Limited |
£4,150 | £8,300 | 2 | 6 Sep 2018 | 0.0 km | |||
| Room 1, 557 Sidcup Road, Greenwich SE9 3AF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £895 | £2,944 | £2,944 | 1 | 26 Aug 2025 | 0.1 km | ||
| Room 4, 14 Well Hall Parade, London SE9 6SP Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Mina Ann Limited |
£700 | £1,334 | £900 | £900 | 1 | 68% | 2 Apr 2020 | 2.0 km |
| 181 Westmount Road, London SE9 1XY Read the reasoning old rulesfigures not yet checked | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £3,222 | £2,572 | £2,572 | 1 | 80% | 3 Jun 2019 | 2.5 km | |
| 173 Restons Crescent, London SE9 2JH Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals Stress Free Estates Ltd |
£650 | £3,250 | £762.50 | £1,525 | 2 | 47% | 17 Oct 2018 | 2.7 km |
| 373a Well Hall Road, London SE9 6TY Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company and individuals | £520 | £6,240 | £6,240 | £6,240 | 1 | 100% | 12 Aug 2021 | 3.2 km |
| 10 Woodlands Street, London SE13 6TU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | Out of time or no jurisdiction | 2 | 9 Mar 2023 | 3.8 km | ||||
| The Gables, 2-4 Blackheath Park, London SE3 9RR Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company Lowe Management Limited |
Dismissed | 5 | 6 Jan 2023 | 3.9 km | ||||
| 4 Ardoch Road, London, SE6 1SJ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £2,119.88 | £4,239.76 | 2 | 23 Jul 2025 | 4.0 km | |||
| 26 Harraden Road, London SE3 8BZ Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company | £3,075 | £1,230 | £2,460 | 2 | 80% | 29 Aug 2018 | 4.0 km | |
| Flat 107, Dragoon Hall, Farndale Court, Master Gunner Place, London SE18 4PW Read the reasoning old rules | Other | individual | £8,800 | £8,800 | £8,800 | 1 | 100% | 9 Sep 2025 | 4.1 km | |
| 82 Whitworth Road, London SE18 3QF Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £1,550 | £9,300 | £1,550 | £6,200 | 4 | 67% | 25 Nov 2022 | 4.2 km |
| 15 Campshill Road, London, SE13 6QU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £21,245.71 | £1,393.66 | £8,361.98 | 6 | 39% | 21 May 2021 | 4.7 km | |
| 21 Clarendon Rise, Hither Green, London SE13 5ES Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £600 | Dismissed | 1 | 27 Nov 2025 | 4.7 km | |||
| Flat above, 191 Lewisham High Street, London SE13 6AA Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | company | £4,143 | £4,143 | 1 | 17 Dec 2019 | 4.9 km | |||
| 9 Charlton Road, London SE3 7EU Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £950 | £1,457.75 | £2,915.50 | 2 | 24 Feb 2023 | 4.9 km | ||
| 84 Garland Road, London, SE18 2PN & 0046 Read the reasoning old rules | Unlicensed HMO | individual | £4,800 | £9,600 | 2 | 7 Jan 2020 | 4.9 km | |||
| 90 Ennis Road, London SE18 2QT Read the reasoning old rules | Illegal eviction | individual | £420 | £4,400 | £4,160 | £4,160 | 1 | 94% | 22 Jan 2022 | 5.0 km |
Rent per calendar month, the maximum the tribunal could award (the rent for the period, less any benefits), the amount ordered and its share of that maximum, as the decision states them. "Per applicant" is the total ordered divided by the number of applicants shown; "Ordered, total" is the whole amount for the decision. A blank maximum means the decision never states it as one figure, or it hasn't been checked. Individual landlords are never named here; companies are.
Email me when a new decision is published near SE9 4TG.
The tribunal's approach to the amount, and the rules on who can apply and when, are explained by Shelter and on GOV.UK. Had a rent increase instead? What the rent tribunal decided nearby.