9 Highgate Street, Liverpool L7 1PE
MAN/00BY/HMF/2024/0018 · Liverpool · decided 17 Jun 2025 · rent repayment order
old rulesfigures not yet checked| Offence | Unlicensed HMO |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Company |
| Applicants | 6 tenants |
| Rent | £424.67 per month |
| Period the order relates to | 18 Jul 2022 to 29 Jun 2023 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | not found |
| Share of the maximum | not stated |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the amount hasn't been checked yet and is left out of the statistics, so compare it with the original.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
requesting is repaid.” 20. … The Tribunal found the correct sums which may be the subject of a rent repayment order are as set out in paragraph 18. Having undertaken a review of the various bank statements of each Applicant we were satisfied on a balance of probabilities that each Applicant had paid their corresponding amount. Therefore, the maximum rent repayment sum for each Applicant could be £4,998.00. … That element of the claim is not awardable in a rent repayment order. … The Tribunal was provided with a Decision in case number MAN/00BY/HMF/2022/0033 in which the Respondent (prior to its insolvency) was found to have committed a similar housing offence regarding a failure to licence residential let property. Other than the Respondent’s insolvency, no other financial information was provided by either party. As to the condition of the Property, the Applicants set out “In one of the bedrooms the radiator was stuck on maximum before they came to fix it, leading to one of the bedrooms being extremely hot for a month.” They also referred to inconsistent Wi-Fi stability. … The Tribunal was unable to deduce from the bank statements whether this sum, or that referred to in paragraph 18, was actually paid by each Applicant. However, based upon the repeated representation, the Tribunal found that the maximum each had paid was in the lesser sum. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near L7 1PE · Licensing schemes and register for L7 1PE
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.