11 Daisy Street, Liverpool L5 7RN

From the tribunal's reasons on the amount

which the Respondent knew, or ought to have known, would lead to the Applicant to adopt any or all of those courses of action outlined in paragraph 28, above? 32 The Tribunal has used the word “negotiate” deliberately. The correspondence it has seen suggests efforts to resolve the difficulties relating to the property. The Applicant may not appreciate the approaches, but they are not suggestive of attempts to secure those objectives that upon which the offence is based. Indeed, those attempts are based upon an appreciation of the respective viewpoints of the parties. They are an attempt to reach a mutually satisfactory solution. 33 The position in relation to the potential eviction of the Applicant by the treatment of the property as being abandoned must be viewed separately. Did this amount to an act of harassment sufficient, on its own or in conjunction with the matter considered in the preceding paragraphs, to suggest the Respondent was seeking to attain those objectives set out in paragraph 28. The circumstances in which it arose and the speed with which the mistake was rectified when the true situation became apparent suggest to the Tribunal that it was neither a deliberate, nor reckless act, made with the intention of achieving those objectives. …

An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.

The original

• This decision on GOV.UK
• PDF

Other rent repayment orders near L5 7RN · Licensing schemes and register for L5 7RN