154 Trevelyan Road, Tooting, London SW17 9LW &
LON/00BJ/HMF/2024/0640 · Wandsworth · decided 27 Jun 2025 · rent repayment order
old rulesfigures not yet checked| Offence | Unlicensed HMO |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Company: ASM Capital Ltd |
| Applicants | 5 tenants |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Period the order relates to | 10 Sep 2022 to 16 Oct 2023 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £1,179.25 per applicant on average; £5,896.25 in total for 5 applicants |
| Share of the maximum | 70%, as the tribunal stated it |
| Tribunal fees to be reimbursed | £440 |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the amount hasn't been checked yet and is left out of the statistics, so compare it with the original.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
amount? The exercise of the tribunal’s discretion. The applicants asked the tribunal to exercise its discretion and make an RRO. The decision of the tribunal. The tribunal determines to exercise its discretion to make a rent repayment order. The reasons for the decision of the tribunal. The tribunal considered the evidence and determined that it was appropriate for it to exercise its discretion and make a rent repayment order because there had been a clear breach of the law. The maximum amount of the RRO which can be ordered. The period for which the RRO is sought is (i) For the first applicant – 10th September 2022 – 9th September 2023 (ii) For the second four applicants - 17 October 2022 to 16 October 2023 28. … The applicants accepted that there should be a deduction for water, gas and electricity, but argued that there should be no deduction from the maximum amount that could be awarded for any council tax paid by the respondent because council tax, unlike water, gas and electricity, was not something that directly benefited the applicants. … The respondent has provided no evidence of the cost of provision of utilities. … The applicants argue that their conduct has been good. They paid rent on time, were careful about reporting repairs and cooperated with the landlord as required. … The applicants argue that the offence is a serious example of a failure to licence. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near SW17 9LW · Licensing schemes and register for SW17 9LW
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.