151 Totterdown Street, London SW17 8TE
LON/00BJ/HMF/2020/0106 · Wandsworth · decided 9 Feb 2021 · rent repayment order
old rulesfigures not yet checked| Offence | Unlicensed HMO |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Company and individuals |
| Applicants | 5 tenants |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Period the order relates to | 30 Jul 2018 to 29 Jul 2019 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £360 per applicant on average; £1,800 in total for 5 applicants |
| Share of the maximum | not stated |
| Tribunal fees to be reimbursed | £300 |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the amount hasn't been checked yet and is left out of the statistics, so compare it with the original.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
She says she did not received rent directly from the applicants. We accept that. … Further she is liable as a person managing the Property as provided for at s263(3)(b) of the 2004 Act. … A question for us is whether the first and second respondent have any culpability. It seems clear to us that under the 2004 Act the first respondent is a party have control and managing the Property (s263 of the 2004 Act). As to the second respondent we consider that s251 of the 2004 Act would apply. This section makes directors liable as it is clear that the offence was with the consent of and the connivance of the seconds respondents, as directors of the company. … No photographs of the Property allegedly showing damage where produced. … The allegations of conduct are between the respondents. There are cross allegations which we do not propose to consider, at least no further than we have made findings on same as set out above. … We conclude that there is no conduct we should take into account, on either side, in assessing the amount of the RRO to made in this case. … We do accept that no respondent has been convicted of an offence to which the 2016 Act applies. … Our findings are this. We consider that it is possible to find more than one party being responsible for the control and or management of the Property. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near SW17 8TE · Licensing schemes and register for SW17 8TE
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.