2 Preachers Court, The Charterhouse, 15 Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6AU

From the tribunal's reasons on the amount

summarily by the Tribunal. In Willow Court, the UT gave important guidance as to how these applications should be determined: "43…… We conclude this section of our decision by emphasising that such applications should not be regarded as routine, should not be abused to discourage access to the tribunal, and should not be allowed to become major disputes in their own right. They should be determined summarily, preferably without the need for a further hearing, and after the parties have had the opportunity to make submissions. We consider that submissions are likely to be better framed in the light of the tribunal’s decision, rather than in anticipation of it, and applications made at interim stages or before the decision is available should not be encouraged. The applicant for an order should be required to identify clearly and specifically the conduct relied on as unreasonable, and if the tribunal considers that there is a case to answer (but not otherwise) the respondent should be given the opportunity to respond to the criticisms made and to offer any explanation or mitigation. A decision to dismiss such an application can be explained briefly. A decision to award

An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.

The original

• This decision on GOV.UK
• PDF

This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 13 Jul 2021.

Other rent repayment orders near EC1M 6AU · Licensing schemes and register for EC1M 6AU