28B Beechfield Road, London, N4 1PE
LON/00AP/HMF/2025/0811 · Haringey · decided 28 Jan 2026 · rent repayment order
old rules| Offence | Unlicensed HMO; also unlicensed house (selective licensing) |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Individual |
| Applicants | 2 tenants |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Period the order relates to | 17 Oct 2023 to 16 Oct 2024 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure (or not yet checked); £1,100 then deducted for utilities |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £6,393.75 per applicant on average; £12,787.50 in total for 2 applicants |
| Share of the maximum | 75%, as the tribunal stated it |
| Tribunal fees to be reimbursed | £341 |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the maximum is left out of the statistics until it has been checked.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
(b) pay a local housing authority an amount in respect of a relevant award of universal credit paid (to any person) in respect of rent under the tenancy.” 21. Section 40(3) lists seven offences “committed by a landlord in relation to housing in England let by that landlord”. … There is a criminal sanction in respect of some of these offences which may result in imprisonment. In other cases, the local housing authority might be expected to take action in the more serious case. However, recognising that the enforcement action taken by local authorities has been too low, the 2016 Act was enacted to provide additional protection for vulnerable tenants against rogue landlords. … It is a defence to the section 95(1) offence of having control of or managing an unlicensed house for the person concerned to show that they had a reasonable excuse for doing so (section 95(4)(a), 2004 Act). … They had to first consider objectively if the defence could amount to a reasonable excuse. Secondly, they have to decide if the facts relied on are proven and whether, viewed objectively, the proven facts provided an objectively reasonable excuse for the conduct of the appellant, taking into account their experience and other relevant characteristics. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near N4 1PE · Licensing schemes and register for N4 1PE
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.