56 Rosaline Road, Fulham, London SW6 7QT
LON/00AN/HMK/2019/0038 · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 12 Sep 2019 · rent repayment order
old rules| Offence | Unlicensed HMO; also harassment |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Individual |
| Applicants | 4 tenants |
| Rent | £3,293.33 per month |
| Period the order relates to | 29 Oct 2017 to ? |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure (or not yet checked) |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £1,646.66 per applicant on average; £6,586.66 in total for 4 applicants |
| Share of the maximum | not stated |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the maximum is left out of the statistics until it has been checked.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
the conduct of the parties and the circumstances (including financial) the first respondent having admitted the offence of a failure to obtain an HMO licence for the subject premises; the rent paid by the applicants and the period for which a rent repayment order could be made not in dispute. The applicants’ case. … The applicants stated that they were seeking a rent repayment order in the sum of £39,507.96 (sic) representing the total amount of rent paid by them during the 12 months period of their tenancy. … The applicants told the tribunal that the repairs had been carried out after complaints had been made but complained that the email responses of the first respondent became more delayed as the tenancy progressed and on occasions she failed to inform them when repairs had been carried out, leaving them to seek confirmation that they had. The applicants accepted that their complaints were always dealt with but had only been notified of the problem with the external drain by the builders carrying out works to the next door property. The applicants denied that hey had been responsible for blocking the drains or having caused any damage to the property that could not be classified as “fair wear and tear.” 14. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near SW6 7QT · Licensing schemes and register for SW6 7QT
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.