13 Earlswood Street, London, SE10 9ET
LON/00AL/HSD/2020/0004 · Greenwich · decided 14 Jun 2021 · rent repayment order
old rulescouncil application| Offence | Unlicensed HMO |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Individual |
| Applicants | the council |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Period the order relates to | 14 Jan 2018 to 23 Dec 2018 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | £6,244.61 |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £6,244.61 in total for the council |
| Share of the maximum | 100%, from the two figures above |
| Tribunal fees to be reimbursed | £300 |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
calculated from 14 January 2018 to 1 October 2017. … By section 45 of the 2016 Act the tribunal may award an amount equivalent to the universal credit paid in respect of a period, not exceeding 12 months, during which the landlord was committing the offence. … That meant that the LHA was seeking an RRO in respect of a shorter period than the maximum twelve months permitted and it did not seek to backdate the commencement of the twelve month period to before 14 January 2018. … Relevant conduct of the landlord. … He drew the Tribunal’s attention to the absence of information as to the Respondent’s financial means in the bundle, other than the LHA having established that she is a joint owner of a buy-to-let property, and that she had redacted the financial information provided to the Applicant.
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near SE10 9ET · Licensing schemes and register for SE10 9ET
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.