Flat 11 Soane Court, St Pancras Way, London NW1 9EG
LON/00AG/HMF/2021/0300 · Camden · decided 4 Nov 2022 · rent repayment order
old rules| Offence | Unlicensed HMO; also other |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Company and individuals: Beachstone Properties Limited |
| Applicants | 5 tenants |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Period the order relates to | 1 Sep 2020 to 6 Jan 2021 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure (or not yet checked) |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £1,088.93 per applicant on average; £5,444.65 in total for 5 applicants |
| Share of the maximum | 95%, as the tribunal stated it |
| Tribunal fees to be reimbursed | £300 |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the maximum is left out of the statistics until it has been checked.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
to be determined in accordance with— (a)section 44 (where the application is made by a tenant); (b)section 45 (where the application is made by a local housing authority); (c)section 46 (in certain cases where the landlord has been convicted etc). … The tribunal finds in light of the proof of the conviction of the first and second respondent and the uncontradicted evidence of the applicants an offence under s.72(1) Housing Act 3004 was committed throughout the full extent of the various periods claimed within 1/9/2022 to 1/3/2021. … The tribunal finds that the first and second respondents are professional landlords and/or managing agents of residential property and failed to comply with the regulations regarding a licensed HMO. The tribunal finds the lack of fire safety measures and the problems concerning the electrical installations were of particular seriousness having regard to the risk to life they presented. … As the respondents took no part in this application and did not provide any financial information the tribunal were unable to have regard to their particular financial circumstances. The tribunal did, however, have regard to the significant fines made against the first and second respondents. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near NW1 9EG · Licensing schemes and register for NW1 9EG
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.