12 Bransdale Close, London NW6 4QH
LON/00AG/HMF/2020/0213 · Camden · decided 2 Jun 2021 · rent repayment order
old rules| Offence | Unlicensed HMO |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Individual |
| Applicants | 4 tenants |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Period the order relates to | 23 Nov 2019 to 7 Feb 2020 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure (or not yet checked) |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £1,392.15 per applicant on average; £5,568.61 in total for 4 applicants |
| Share of the maximum | 100%, as the tribunal stated it |
| Tribunal fees to be reimbursed | £300 |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the maximum is left out of the statistics until it has been checked.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
of rent paid by the applicants during the periods of occupancy as set out within the trial bundle where the rents actually paid were fully stated in a spreadsheet format. The amounts are set out in this decision at paragraph (2) above. These sums represent the maximum sum, (100%), that might form the amount of rent repayment orders. … Amongst other factors the tribunal should be mindful of the length of time that an offence was being committed and the culpability of the landlord is relevant; a professional landlord is expected to know better. From the evidence before it provided by the applicants the Tribunal took the view that the respondent was a professional landlord. The Tribunal was told that the respondent in fact owned some 25 properties. … The circumstances in which the offence was committed are always likely to be material. A deliberate flouting of the requirement to register will obviously merit a larger RRO than instances of inadvertence – although all HMO landlords ought to know the law. A landlord who is engaged professionally in letting is likely to be more harshly dealt with than the non-professional.” 22. … The Tribunal must therefore consider the conduct of the parties and the financial circumstances of the respondent. Express matter (c) was not considered as no such convictions apply so far as the respondent is concerned. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near NW6 4QH · Licensing schemes and register for NW6 4QH
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.