Apartment 16 Nightingale House, Ockbrook Drive, Mapperley, Nottingham NG3 6AT
BIR/00FY/HMK/2020/0021 · Nottingham · decided 2 Sep 2020 · rent repayment order
old rules| Offence | Unlicensed house (selective licensing) |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Company and individuals: Mapperley Management Limited |
| Applicants | 1 tenant |
| Rent | £500 per month |
| Period the order relates to | 21 Feb 2019 to 20 Feb 2020 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | £6,000 |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £6,000 (1 applicant) |
| Share of the maximum | 100%, as the tribunal stated it |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
Offence Section 95 (1) of the 2004 Act 29. Section 95(1) provides that: ‘a person commits an offence if he is a person having control of or managing a house which is required to be licensed under [section 85(1) of the 2004 Act] but is not so licensed.’ 30. Section 95(2) provides that it is a defence if: ‘at the material time, a. ………. b. an application for a licence had been duly made in respect of the house under section 87 and that ……..application was still effective.’ 31. Section 95(4) provides that is a defence if the person: ‘had a reasonable excuse- a. for having control or managing the house in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (1) or b. ……………’ 32. Section 263 of the 2004 Act provides: (1) In this Act ‘a person having control’ in relation to premises, means (unless the context otherwise requires), the person who receives the rack rent of the premises whether on his own account or as agent or trustee of another person) ……. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near NG3 6AT · Licensing schemes and register for NG3 6AT
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.