33 Beeston Road, Nottingham, NG7 2JS
BIR/00FK/HMK/2019/0055 · Nottingham · decided 19 Feb 2020 · rent repayment order
old rules| Offence | Unlicensed HMO |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Individual |
| Applicants | 2 tenants |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Period the order relates to | ? to 10 May 2019 |
| Maximum the tribunal could award | not stated as one figure (or not yet checked); £572.13 then deducted for utilities |
| Amount the tribunal ordered | £3,071.31 per applicant on average; £6,142.62 in total for 2 applicants |
| Share of the maximum | not stated |
| Tribunal fees to be reimbursed | £200 |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants; the maximum is left out of the statistics until it has been checked.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
The Tribunal was therefore only able to carry out an external inspection. The Tribunal considers this to be disrespectful. … The property comprises of a three storey end terraced house of traditional brick construction surmounted by a pitched re-slated roof. There was a single storey rear addition with a tiled roof. … The property is built up to the pavement and to the rear is a small yard and garden. … The Tribunal found the property to be double glazed and to be in fair condition externally although the chimney stacks were both noted to be in poor condition with the rear stack leaning considerably. The Tribunal considers this will probably require rebuilding. … In addition, the applicants list a number of problems encountered during their occupation. Briefly these can be summarised as follows: 1) On 26th October 2018 an email was sent regarding a missing lightbulb on the stairs as well as the issue of utility bills in spite of the tenancy agreement being inclusive of services. 2) On 29th October 2018 an email was sent regarding disrepair at the property. The respondent’s agents claimed to have spoken to the respondent earlier but he did not agree to the cost of repairs and insisted on employing a firm from London himself. …
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near NG7 2JS · Licensing schemes and register for NG7 2JS
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.