Leasehold decisions near KT5 8LA
Based on 12 decisions within 2 km of KT5 8LA.
The search widens from 2 km (to 5, then 10 km) until at least 10 decisions are found.
What the tribunal decided here
12 decisions: dispensation from consultation 4, LCP 2, right to manage 1, administration charges 1, service charges 1, appointment of a manager 1, LUS 1, breach of lease 1. 1 is a service charge case, 0 with a readable outcome.
Dispensation applications (landlord-driven, never in the share above): 4, granted 4, refused 0.
Items most often disallowed or reduced here: insurance (1), cleaning and grounds (1), management fees (1), other (1), repairs and maintenance (1).
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (2 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-12 Norfolk Court, KT5 8LA | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Proxim Property Management Ltd | other | 4 Nov 2024 | 0.0 km | ||
| 97 King Charles Road, Surbiton, KT5 8PG | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Orchidbase Limited | repairs and maintenance | 20 May 2025 | 0.1 km | ||
| Bramshott Lodge, 18a South Bank, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 6DB | LCP | Other decision | Eagerstates Limited | Assethold Limited | management fees, legal and professional fees | 17 Jul 2024 | 0.6 km | |
| Bramshott Lodge, 18a South Bank, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 6DB | right to manage | Dismissed or struck out | Assethold Limited | Bramshott Lodge RTM Company Ltd | 4 Sep 2020 | 0.6 km | ||
| 171 Surbiton Hill Park, Surbiton, KT5 8EL figures not yet checked | administration charges | Not payable s.20C order made |
Concept 34 Ltd | administration charges | 11 May 2021 | 1.1 km | ||
| Flat B, 43, St James Road, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 4QN | service charges | Other decision s.20C order made |
Chestnut Tree Property Management Limited | Ian Humberstone Limited | Chestnut Tree Property Management Limited | insurance | 7 Mar 2019 | 1.1 km |
| 66 Cranes Park, Surbiton, KT5 8AS | LCP | Other decision | Assethold Ltd | 21 Jan 2020 | 1.1 km | |||
| Hanover House and Tudor House, Royal Windsor Court, Tolworth, Surrey, KT6 7BG | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Lenelby Road (Tolworth) Management Company Limited | major works, repairs and maintenance | 2 Mar 2020 | 1.2 km | ||
| 27 Beaufort Road, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 2TH | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | repairs and maintenance | 16 Feb 2021 | 1.3 km | |||
| 45A/45 Victoria Avenue, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 5DN figures not yet checked | appointment of a manager | Dismissed or struck out s.20C refused |
major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, utilities | 16 Nov 2020 | 1.4 km | |||
| 23 Fassett Road, Kingston Upon Thames, London KT1 2TD | LUS | Other decision | Eagerstates Limited | Assethold Limited | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities | 10 Nov 2023 | 1.4 km | |
| 5 St Stephens Cottages, 70 Vincent Road, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 3HJ | breach of lease | Other decision | Paragon Asra Housing Ltd. | 23 Dec 2020 | 1.8 km |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.