27 Beaufort Road, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 2TH
LON/00AX/LDC/2020/0200 · dispensation from consultation · Kingston upon Thames · decided 16 Feb 2021
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the communal boiler carried out in February 2020, costing £1,239.60 including VAT, as no lessee objected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,239.60 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 7 self-contained flats
- years
works carried out to the communal hot water and heating boiler in February 2020
- outcome
Dispensation from consultation is granted by the tribunal to the applicant in respect of the works carried out to the boiler in February 2020
- total demanded
in the sum of £1,239.60 (inclusive of VAT)
- s20
the tribunal grants the dispensation sought by the applicant under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.