171 Surbiton Hill Park, Surbiton, KT5 8EL

LON/00AX/LAC/2021/0002 · administration charges · Kingston upon Thames · decided 11 May 2021

figures not yet checked

The tribunal decided that nothing is payable by the applicant for the 2018 and 2020 administration charges, because no summary of rights and obligations accompanied the demands, and made an order under section 20C so the landlord's tribunal costs cannot be added to the service charge.

Outcome	Not payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Concept 34 Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	2018, 2020
Items in dispute	administration charges
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years: administrative charges levied in 2018 and 2020
outcome: nothing is payable by the applicant in respect of the administrative charges levied in 2018 and 2020
items reduced: nothing is payable by the applicant in respect of the administrative charges levied in 2018 and 2020
total payable: nothing is payable by the applicant
s20c: The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.