Bramshott Lodge, 18a South Bank, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 6DB
LON/00AX/LRM/2020/0009 · right to manage · Kingston upon Thames · decided 4 Sep 2020
The tribunal found that the RTM company's application was not validly made within the two-month time limit because its form did not tick the type of application, so the tribunal has no jurisdiction.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | Bramshott Lodge RTM Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2002 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- management company
Applicant : Bramshott Lodge RTM Company Ltd
- outcome
the tribunal determines that a valid application was not made in time and that consequently, the tribunal does not have jurisdiction.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.