88 Hartington Road, Liverpool, L8 0SH
MAN/00BY/LBC/2019/0010 · Liverpool · decided 9 Jan 2020 · rent repayment order
old rulesOther ruling: the tribunal did not make a rent repayment order in this decision. See the original for its reasons.
| Offence | Other |
|---|---|
| Landlord | Individual |
| Applicants | 1 tenant |
| Rent | not stated as one figure |
| Rules | Old rules (offence before 1 May 2026): maximum 12 months' rent. |
Read from the PDF automatically. Amounts are totals for the decision, across all its applicants.
From the tribunal's reasons on the amount
tenantable repair” within the meaning of the covenant referred to at paragraph 3, above. The inspection confirmed the view of the Applicant’s surveyor, to the extent that the Tribunal could safely investigate it. 16 The condition of the property is such that the Tribunal does not need to explore the niceties of what amounts to good and substantial repair and condition, so far is it from such condition. 17 It does however observe that the covenant is clear that the obligation is to keep the property in such condition and not necessarily put it in that condition. In the absence of any argument that the condition predates the granting of the lease, if that was ever ascertainable now, it is clear that the covenant has been breached.
An extract from the part of the decision that sets the amount. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Other rent repayment orders near L8 0SH · Licensing schemes and register for L8 0SH
Past decisions are not a prediction. The tribunal decides each case on its facts, including the landlord's and tenant's conduct.