Leasehold decisions near DH3 3SQ
Based on 12 decisions within 10 km of DH3 3SQ.
The search widens from 2 km (to 5, then 10 km) until at least 10 decisions are found.
What the tribunal decided here
12 decisions: dispensation from consultation 6, service charges 3, breach of lease 2, LVT 1. 3 are service charge cases, 3 with a readable outcome.
Only 3 decisions with a readable outcome. That is too few to show a pattern.
Dispensation applications (landlord-driven, never in the share above): 6, granted 5, refused 0.
Items most often disallowed or reduced here: administration charges (1), utilities (1).
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (0 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 Sandringham Court, Chester le Street DH3 3SQ | breach of lease | Other decision | City Management Ltd | Adriatic Land 4 Ltd | Sandringham Court (Picktree) Management Ltd. | 13 Jun 2019 | 0.0 km | |
| 9 & 10 Dunlin Drive, Ayton, Washington NE38 0EB | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | repairs and maintenance | 7 May 2019 | 3.5 km | |||
| 34 & 35 Kestrel Close, Ayton, Washington NE38 0EB | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | repairs and maintenance | 7 May 2019 | 3.5 km | |||
| 22-25, Warkworth Close, Oxclose, Washington, Tyne & Wear, NE38 0JL | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | repairs and maintenance | 22 May 2025 | 4.6 km | |||
| 10 - 13 Waltham, Washington, Tyne & Wear, NE38 7JY | dispensation from consultation | Consultation failure found | Gentoo Group Limited | major works | 22 Apr 2025 | 4.8 km | ||
| Various Properties at Washington NE38 0HU | LVT | Other decision | Gentoo Group Limited | other | 5 Jun 2020 | 4.9 km | ||
| 99 Collingwood Court, Marlborough Park, Washington NE37 3ED | breach of lease | Other decision | Marlborough Park Services Limited | repairs and maintenance, utilities | 4 Mar 2020 | 7.3 km | ||
| 33 Marlborough Street, Sulgrave, Washington NE37 3BP | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Gentoo Group Limited | repairs and maintenance | 19 Jul 2021 | 7.4 km | ||
| 1-9 Taylor Court, Carrville, Durham DH1 1EL | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | repairs and maintenance | 16 Sep 2021 | 8.1 km | |||
| 17 Goldstone, Pimlico Court, Low Fell, Gateshead, NE9 5HW | service charges | Payable as demanded s.20C refused |
J H Watson Property Management Ltd | legal and professional fees, major works | 15 Jan 2025 | 8.3 km | ||
| 24 Goldstone, Pimlico Court, Kells Lane, Gateshead NE9 5HW | service charges | Reduced s.20C refused |
JH Watson Property Investment Limited | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities | 21 Mar 2023 | 8.3 km | ||
| Flats 1,2 and 4 The Warehouse, Well Lane, Low Fell, Gateshead Tyne & Wear NE9 6JW | service charges | Reduced s.20C order made |
Kingston Property Services Limited | Adriatic Land 1 (GR3) Limited | administration charges, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities | 21 Oct 2024 | 8.5 km |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.