10 - 13 Waltham, Washington, Tyne & Wear, NE38 7JY
MAN/00CM/LDC/2024/0041 · dispensation from consultation · Sunderland · decided 22 Apr 2025
The tribunal refused the landlord's application for retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the reroofing, finding that no consultation took place and that the offer not to charge for further repairs was not adequate compensation.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Gentoo Group Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 4 self-contained residential apartments arranged over two floors
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freehold owner for the Property
- outcome
the tribunal makes a determination to refuse to dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents
- s20
At no point did the Applicant engage in any consultation, either formal or informal, with the [name] over the repairs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.