17 Goldstone, Pimlico Court, Low Fell, Gateshead, NE9 5HW
MAN/00CH/LSC/2023/0092 · service charges · Gateshead · decided 15 Jan 2025
The tribunal found the 2017 roof replacement and project management charges payable as shown in the 2018 account, despite a consultation notice error, because no prejudice was shown, and made no order limiting the landlord's costs.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | J H Watson Property Management Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 16 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
one of 16 apartments in the property known as Goldstone
- agent
Watson Property Management Ltd (“Watson”) are the managing agents.
- years
for the service charge year ending 31
- outcome
The service charges payable by the Applicant for the service charge year ending 31
- s20c
no order is made in respect of costs under section 20C of the 1985 Act.
- s20
that error does not negate the consultation carried out by Watson
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.