Leasehold decisions matching "93 Rupert Street, Nechells, Birmingham, B7 5DS"
Based on 2 decisions whose published address matches "93 Rupert Street, Nechells, Birmingham, B7 5DS".
What the tribunal decided here
2 decisions: service charges 1, LIS 1. 2 are service charge cases, 2 with a readable outcome.
Only 2 decisions with a readable outcome. That is too few to show a pattern.
Items most often disallowed or reduced here: management fees (1), other (1), reserve fund (1).
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (0 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 Rupert Street, Nechells, Birmingham, B7 5DS | service charges | Reduced | Sycamore Management (Nechells) No.1 Ltd | Sycamore Management (Nechells) No.1 Ltd | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities | 20 Apr 2023 | |
| 93 Rupert Street, Nechells, Birmingham, B7 5DS | LIS | Reduced | Sycamore Management (Nechells) No. 1 Ltd | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities | 5 Sep 2022 |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.