93 Rupert Street, Nechells, Birmingham, B7 5DS
BIR/00CN/LIS/2021/0041 · LIS · Birmingham · decided 5 Sep 2022
The tribunal found the estimated service charge for 2022 reasonable apart from the £7,500 reserve fund provision for roof replacement, which it found not reasonable because the Applicant had not explained what it covered or how it was compiled.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Sycamore Management (Nechells) No. 1 Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 13 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | reserve fund |
| Total demanded | £25,000 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises a four storey purpose built and self-contained block of 13 apartments (maisonettes and flats)
- freeholder
entered into by Hartley Property Trust Limited, the Applicant, and a named lessee
- management company
Applicants : Sycamore Management (Nechells) No. 1 Ltd
- years
the estimated costs for the year ending 30 September 2022 were £25,000.00
- outcome
the Tribunal is not in a position to find that this is a reasonable estimate and so determines.
- items reduced
the Tribunal is not in a position to find that this is a reasonable estimate and so determines.
- total demanded
totalling £25,000.00 (‘the estimated service charge’)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.