93 Rupert Street, Nechells, Birmingham, B7 5DS
BIR/00CN/LSC/2022/0010 · service charges · Birmingham · decided 20 Apr 2023
The tribunal found most proposed service charge items reasonable for the year ending 30 September 2023, reduced external management fees to £3,250 and limited health and safety costs to £139.20, and made no decision yet on the roof, ceilings and general heads.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Sycamore Management (Nechells) No.1 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Sycamore Management (Nechells) No.1 Ltd |
| Building | One flat · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | management fees, other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising overall thirteen such properties within the relevant development
- freeholder
The Applicant is both owner and managing agent of the property
- agent
The Applicant is both owner and managing agent of the property
- years
in respect of the service charge year ending 30 September 2023
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore determines that a sum of £3,250 is a reasonable sum in respect of external management of the development.
- items reduced
The Tribunal therefore determines that a sum of £3,250 is a reasonable sum in respect of external management of the development.
- s20
a sum of £250 will be the maximum sum the Applicant is entitled to recover by way of service charge
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.