Leasehold decisions matching "Wick Hall, Furze Hill, Hove, East Sussex BN3 1NJ"
Based on 2 decisions whose published address matches "Wick Hall, Furze Hill, Hove, East Sussex BN3 1NJ".
What the tribunal decided here
2 decisions: service charges 1, right to manage 1. 1 is a service charge case, 1 with a readable outcome.
Only 1 decision with a readable outcome. That is too few to show a pattern.
Items most often disallowed or reduced here: other (1).
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (0 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wick Hall, Furze Hill, Hove, East Sussex BN3 1NJ | service charges | Reduced s.20C order made |
Baron Estate Management Ltd | other | 24 Jan 2023 | ||
| Wick Hall, Furze Hill, Hove, East Sussex BN3 1NJ | right to manage | Other decision | reserve fund | 10 Aug 2022 |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.