Wick Hall, Furze Hill, Hove, East Sussex BN3 1NJ
CHI/00ML/LRM/2021/0013 · right to manage · Brighton and Hove · decided 10 Aug 2022
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 168 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
it is satisfied that there are 168 flats
- freeholder
the freeholder
- management company
[name] Hall (Hove) RTM Company Limited (the Applicant) was incorporated on
- outcome
The Tribunal confirms the Applicant’s claim that it is entitled to the right to manage the Property.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.