Weekday Cross, Pilcher Gate, Nottingham, NG1 1QF
BIR/00FY/LLC/2021/0013 · LLC · Nottingham · decided 9 Dec 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal refused the leaseholders' application that the landlord's legal costs of the earlier dispensation proceedings should not be added to the service charge, so those costs may be recovered through the service charge (subject to later reasonableness review).
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Holding and Management (Solitaire) Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 98 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 98 flats or units in the part of the Building which are the subject of
- freeholder
Respondent : Holding and Management (Solitaire) Ltd
- outcome
The Application is dismissed.
- s20c
For this reason, the Tribunal determines that the Applicants are not entitled to an order under s20C of the Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.