The Hicking Building, Queens Road, Nottingham, NG2 3BX
BIR/00FY/LSC/2020/0008 · service charges · Nottingham · decided 14 Sep 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that only £51,146.90 net of the £62,720.38 net invoiced for 2020 internal corridor fire-stopping works was reasonably incurred, and later ordered that none of the costs of the proceedings can be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abacus Land 4 Ltd |
| Management company | The Hicking Building RTM Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 329 flats · 3 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | £62,720.38 |
| Total found payable | £51,146.90 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Applicants who between them own 39 of the 329 apartments at the Property
- freeholder
Abacus Land 4 Ltd (2)
- management company
The Hicking Building RTM Company Ltd (1)
- years
Our determination is that the service charge for 2020 for the Property can include a charge of £51,146.90 net
- outcome
Our determination is that the service charge for 2020 for the Property can include a charge of £51,146.90 net
- items reduced
Any greater sum is not reasonably incurred and therefore would not be payable.
- total demanded
The sum paid of £62,720.38 net was considered to be unreasonable
- total payable
can include a charge of £51,146.90 net
- s20c
that none of the costs of the proceedings under reference BIR/00FY/LSC/2020/0008 are to be regarded as relevant costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.