The Hicking Building, Queens Road, Nottingham, NG2 3BX
BIR/00FY/LSC/2020/0007 · service charges · Nottingham · decided 5 Apr 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the cladding works recoverable through the service charge and granted dispensation from consultation for them, but found the timber balcony decking works not recoverable under the leases and refused dispensation for them.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abacus Land 4 Ltd |
| Management company | The Hicking Building RTM Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | The Hicking Building RTM Company Ltd |
| Building | A block, 329 flats · 3 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2004 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Building comprises 329 residential flats and two commercial units.
- freeholder
The freeholder is [name] Land 4 Ltd, who has taken no part in these proceedings.
- management company
It is managed by The [name] Building RTM Company Ltd (“the Applicant”)
- items reduced
It would not be reasonable for the Applicant to incur costs for the Balcony Works and then seek to charge those costs to service charge payers under the leases as
- s20
We therefore grant dispensation (if it turns out that consultation is required), in respect of the incurring of costs for the Cladding Works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.