Red House Apartments, 269 Sanderstead Road, South Croydon, Surrey, CR2 0AG
LON/00AH/LSC/2022/0041 · service charges · Croydon · decided 5 May 2022
The Tribunal struck out the Applicant's new application as an abuse of process because the s.20B point should have been raised in the earlier hearing on the same service charges.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Ltd
- agent
Representative : Eagerstates Ltd
- years
the Respondent’s claim for service charges between 25 December 2018 and 11 May 2019
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the present application is an abuse of process and is struck out
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.