Poets House, 47 Erskine Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM1 3AT
LON/00BF/LRM/2023/0016 · right to manage · Sutton · decided 12 Sep 2023
The tribunal found that no valid counter-notice was served by either the previous or the current freeholder, so it has no jurisdiction to decide the right to manage application.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | Poets House RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- management company
Applicant : Poets House RTM Company Limited
- agent
Mr [name] is a director or employee of Eagerstates Ltd, who act as managing agents for Assethold Ltd.
- outcome
no valid counter notice has been served by either previous or the current freeholder
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.