Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BH1 1RN

Lansdowne Manor, 55 Lansdowne Road, Bournemouth BH1 1RN

CHI/00HN/LCP/2024/0002 · LCP · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 8 Oct 2024

The tribunal ordered the RTM company to pay the landlord £1,957.28 in solicitor's and managing agent's costs of the right to manage claim, and to reimburse the £100 application fee.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordAssethold Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentEagerstates Limited
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, management fees, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payable£1,957.28
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to reimburse the application fee of £100

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent
the managing agent, Eagerstates Limited, is provided
outcome
the Tribunal determines under section 88(4) of the 2002 Act and duly orders that costs in the sum of £1,957.28 are payable by the Respondent to the Applicant
total payable
costs in the sum of £1,957.28 are payable by the Respondent to the Applicant
costs
the Respondent shall also reimburse the application fee of £100 paid by the Applicant

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.